Some Stuff and Some Things

I don't even know what a tagline is.

786 notes

Fox News Speculates Trayvon Martin Could Have Killed Someone With Skittles And Iced Tea

reallyfoxnews:

“I know everybody keeps sarcastically saying about he Skittles,” [Doug] Burns said. “You could probably kill somebody with Skittles.”

Fox host Jamie Colby replied, “But he didn’t take that iced tea and bang Zimmerman over the head with the bottle.”

“The thing is, yeah, you’re spinning a lot of hypotheticals,” Burns said. “And you could break a bottle of iced tea, right, with the jagged edge, and you could kill somebody with it.”

Video.

Fox News just won the award for stupidest, most racist, most useless news organization in the world. Fox News ftw. 

(via silas216)

67 notes

thomdunn: Yes, you’re right. Gay Marriage causes abortions. Lots of ‘em. Yup. Definitely. Because of all those gay couples in “fake” marriages who are conceiving children together and then using abortions instead of birth contr- wait I’m confused. (via Vice)

thomdunn:

Yes, you’re right. Gay Marriage causes abortions. Lots of ‘em. Yup. Definitely. Because of all those gay couples in “fake” marriages who are conceiving children together and then using abortions instead of birth contr- wait I’m confused. (via Vice)

(via arguing-about-abortions)

248 notes

arguing-about-abortions:

skinnierthansticks:

I’m honestly so sick of seeing pro-abortion shit literally everywhere. I love my friends but seeing this stuff kind of angers me. You’re entitled to your opinion and that’s fine, but you’re all going public with your political views, so here’s mine.   

I understand your viewpoint. It is “your body” and therefore should not be subject to government legislation. However, once you become pregnant, you are carrying a baby. No, not a fetus. A baby. And you say my religion shouldn’t infringe on your rights. Well it’s not. There is overwhelming scientific research that clearly states that, whatever you want to call the life inside of you, it’s a person.  If you did research on the subject instead of believing the things the liberal media feeds you, you would know that already. Therefore, that tiny person is entitled to the same constitutional rights you are. You should not be able to deny them life because of your decisions. End of story.  Many abortion procedures aren’t even humane. Unborn babies can feel pain very early in their gestation. Many abortion procedures involve dismemberment of the baby, or in the case of partial-birth abortions, partial delivery of the baby, and then subsequently sucking his or her brain out of his or her head, collapsing their skull. All of this, the baby feels. How can you not look at this and think, wow, perhaps there is something wrong with this picture. I’m all for feminism, but I’m not for killing people. Women should have completely equal rights.  All things considered, abortion is a separate issue. Men cannot produce children. There is no issue of equality here. Excluding all religion, ONLY regarding science, the organism in a pregnant woman’s uterus is her living child, which means it has fucking rights. This isn’t coming from a religious zealot picketing outside of an abortion clinic. This is coming from a well-researched agnostic who is able to think for herself. It is fine to want control over your own body, but you’re not entitled to control over someone else’s. That baby constitutes “someone else”. Your defiance of politicians and their control over your sex lives and whom you choose to marry, rape culture, and sexism, is completely valid and logical. But abortion is not a right you should get. Because, with abortion, you ARE actually infringing upon someone else’s life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. It becomes the business of others, when you are willing to hurt another for your own purposes. No matter what the situation is, that is wrong.

It’s almost 4 A.M., I was given a massive amount of Benadryl earlier, and I can’t sleep. Let’s. Take. This. Down.

Read More

Re-blogging for arguing-about-abortions commentary which is literally a work of fucking genius. I want to print it out and laminate it and just use it as a reference for the rest of my life when it comes to anti-choice peeps.  

Filed under pro choice pro life gets us nowhere feminism my body my choice my body my rights

74 notes

quickhits: Gun lobby: immigration reform means lazy brown people are gonna take away your guns! Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt emails supporters: You Could Lose all your Guns before 2035 under the Amnesty Bill before the Senate Contact your Senators and urge them to vote against the anti-gun immigration amnesty bill. We’ve written you before about the immigration amnesty bill that will be debated on the Senate floor beginning June 10. We had just been through a hard fight to stop gun bans and registration.  And some of you may have even felt the immigration amnesty was not a “gun” issue. But if the amnesty bill is passed, within 20 years, Washington could be as anti-gun as Albany, Hartford, and Sacramento. This is because the bill will create at least 11,500,000 new citizens — but probably closer to 20,000,000 — and, if history is any guide, they will vote 71% of the time for far Left Democrats like Barack Obama. … By 2035, the battle will no longer be about stopping the expansion of background checks.  Most likely, it will be about stopping the government from coming to take your guns away. And there is nothing we will be able to do about it. Right Wing Watch notes that Pratt “has been going-all out against immigration reform, warning that immigrants will ‘vote to take away our guns’ and are ‘going to be probably just sitting around drawing welfare and voting Democrat.’ He told radio host Steve Deace earlier this week that if a reform bill passes, ‘you can buh bye to your guns and buh bye to the rest of your freedom because this would be a country that had been californicated.’” Is anyone in the media going to notice that the gun lobby is getting blatantly racist? [photo by Neon Tommy] So am I the only ones that think that Larry Pratt’s logic is a tiny little bit ridiculous? 

quickhits:

Gun lobby: immigration reform means lazy brown people are gonna take away your guns!

Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt emails supporters:

You Could Lose all your Guns before 2035 under the Amnesty Bill before the Senate

Contact your Senators and urge them to vote against the anti-gun immigration amnesty bill.

We’ve written you before about the immigration amnesty bill that will be debated on the Senate floor beginning June 10.

We had just been through a hard fight to stop gun bans and registration.  And some of you may have even felt the immigration amnesty was not a “gun” issue.

But if the amnesty bill is passed, within 20 years, Washington could be as anti-gun as Albany, Hartford, and Sacramento.

This is because the bill will create at least 11,500,000 new citizens — but probably closer to 20,000,000 — and, if history is any guide, they will vote 71% of the time for far Left Democrats like Barack Obama.

…

By 2035, the battle will no longer be about stopping the expansion of background checks.  Most likely, it will be about stopping the government from coming to take your guns away. And there is nothing we will be able to do about it.

Right Wing Watch notes that Pratt “has been going-all out against immigration reform, warning that immigrants will ‘vote to take away our guns’ and are ‘going to be probably just sitting around drawing welfare and voting Democrat.’ He told radio host Steve Deace earlier this week that if a reform bill passes, ‘you can buh bye to your guns and buh bye to the rest of your freedom because this would be a country that had been californicated.’”

Is anyone in the media going to notice that the gun lobby is getting blatantly racist?

[photo by Neon Tommy]

So am I the only ones that think that Larry Pratt’s logic is a tiny little bit ridiculous? 

(via silas216)